REALbasic Alternatives: How to Choose the Best Cross-Platform Development Tool
REALbasic is a development tool that allows you to create applications using the BASIC programming language. It supports cross-platform development for Windows, Mac OS Classic and Mac OS X. However, REALbasic is not the only option for cross-platform development. There are many other tools that claim to offer similar or better features and performance. How do you choose the best one for your projects?
In this article, we will compare some of the most popular REALbasic alternatives and help you decide which one suits your needs and preferences.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of REALbasic?
Before we look at the alternatives, let's review some of the pros and cons of REALbasic.
It uses a familiar and easy-to-learn programming language (BASIC).
It has a drag-and-drop user interface builder with over 40 native controls.
It compiles to machine code and links to a runtime library, which makes it faster than interpreted languages.
It has a rich framework that supports graphics, database servers, internet protocols and more.
It has an active community and tons of resources for learning and support.
It is not free. You have to pay for a license to use it and deploy your apps.
It is not updated frequently. The latest version (2019r3) was released in December 2019.
It does not support some modern features and platforms, such as iOS, Android, Linux, web and Raspberry Pi.
It has some compatibility issues with newer versions of Windows and Mac OS.
It has some limitations and bugs that can affect your app's functionality and performance.
What are some of the best REALbasic alternatives?
There are many tools that can be used as alternatives to REALbasic. Some of them are:
Xojo: This is the successor of REALbasic, developed by the same company (Xojo Inc.). It uses the same programming language (Xojo) and user interface builder as REALbasic, but it supports more platforms (Windows, Mac OS, Linux, web, iOS and Raspberry Pi). It also has more features and improvements than REALbasic, such as LLVM compiler, Cocoa framework, HiDPI support and more. However, it is also more expensive than REALbasic, and it still has some of the same drawbacks, such as slow updates, compatibility issues and bugs.
Java: This is a general-purpose programming language that runs on any platform that has a Java Runtime Environment (JRE) installed. It has a huge library of classes and frameworks that cover almost any functionality you can think of. It also has many tools and IDEs for developing cross-platform applications, such as Eclipse, NetBeans, IntelliJ IDEA and more. However, Java is not very easy to learn and use, especially for beginners. It also does not have a native look and feel for the user interface on different platforms. It can also be slower than compiled languages like REALbasic or Xojo.
LiveCode: This is a development tool that uses a scripting language similar to HyperCard or Lingo. It allows you to create applications for Windows, Mac OS, Linux, web, iOS, Android and Raspberry Pi with a drag-and-drop interface builder. It also has a rich set of commands and functions that make coding easier and faster. However, LiveCode is not very popular or widely used compared to other tools. It also has a steep learning curve and a different syntax than most programming languages. It can also be less efficient and reliable than compiled languages like REALbasic or Xojo.
How to compare REALbasic alternatives?
When choosing a cross-platform development tool, there are several factors that you should consider, such as:
Cost: How much does the tool cost to use and deploy your apps? Is it free, open source, subscription-based or one-time payment? Does it have different pricing plans for different features and platforms?
Platform support: Which platforms does the tool support? Does it cover all the platforms that you need or want to target? How easy is it to port your app from one platform to another?
Language and syntax: What programming language does the tool use? Is it a familiar and easy-to-learn language or a complex and obscure one? How similar or different is it from REALbasic or other languages that you know?
User interface: How does the tool help you design and create your app's user interface? Does it have a drag-and-drop interface builder or a code-based approach? Does it have native controls or custom widgets? How does it handle layout, resizing, localization and accessibility?
Framework and features: What functionality does the tool provide for your app? Does it have a rich and comprehensive framework that covers graphics, database, internet, multimedia and more? Does it have advanced features such as debugging, testing, profiling and deployment?
Performance and reliability: How fast and efficient is the tool and your app? Does it compile to native code or use an interpreter or a virtual machine? Does it have memory management and garbage collection? Does it have any limitations or bugs that can affect your app's functionality and performance?
Community and support: How popular and widely used is the tool? Does it have an active and helpful community of developers and users? Does it have enough resources for learning and support, such as documentation, tutorials, examples, forums and conferences?
In conclusion, REALbasic is a good cross-platform development tool that has many advantages, but also some disadvantages. It may not be the best choice for every project or developer. There are many alternatives that offer similar or better features and performance. However, there is no single best tool that suits everyone's needs and preferences. You have to compare different tools based on various factors and decide which one works best for you. d282676c82